Nb-UVB and PUVA therapy in treating early stages of Mycosis Fungoides: A single-center cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary Syndrome are the most common forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Early-stage MF is known to have an indolent behavior, and the EORTC guidelines recommend treating patients with skin-directed therapies, such as phototherapy, instead of systemic therapies. Phototherapy is a popular therapeutic option, with two commonly used light sources-PUVA and narrow band-nb UVB. PUVA is less commonly used due to its potential carcinogenic role, but it has systemic effects, while nb-UVB has mostly skin-limited effects. There is ongoing debate regarding the role of UVB light, and in 2021, the Cutaneous Lymphoma Italian Study Group reached a consensus on technical schedules for NB-UVB and PUVA for MF. This study aims to analyze and compare the efficacy of the two phototherapy options in treating early-MF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients diagnosed with stage IA/B MF in the last 10 years, who had at least 12 months of follow-up data and a minimum of 24 phototherapy sessions (PUVA or nb UVB) and treated with topical steroids apart from phototherapy. RESULTS: Results showed that the two phototherapy options were similarly effective in treating early MF, with no significant differences in clinical response, although PUVA was associated with more adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides valuable insights into the use of phototherapy in early MF, and the results can be used to guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Update on the Management of Pediatric Psoriasis: An Italian Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis affects children with a considerable burden in early life. Treating pediatric psoriasis is challenging also because of the lack of updated specific guidelines. With the recent approval of several biologics for pediatric psoriasis and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the management of young psoriatic patients is facing major changes. A revision of treatment recommendations is therefore needed. METHODS: In September 2021, a board of six Italian dermatologists convened to update treatment recommendations. The board issued evidence- and consensus-based statements covering relevant areas of pediatric psoriasis, namely: assessment of psoriasis severity, management of children with psoriasis, and treatment of pediatric psoriasis. To reach consensus, the statements were submitted to a panel of 24 experts in a Delphi process performed entirely via videoconference. A treatment algorithm was produced. RESULTS: There was full consensus that psoriasis severity is determined by the extension/severity of skin lesions, site of lesions, and impact on patient quality of life. Agreement was reached on the need for a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric psoriasis and the importance of patient/parents education. The relevance of vaccinations, including COVID-19 vaccination, for psoriatic children was acknowledged by all participants. Management issues that initially failed to reach consensus included the screening for psoriasis comorbidities and early treatment with biologics to prevent them and the use of telemedicine to facilitate patient follow-up. There was full consensus that topical corticosteroids are the first choice for the treatment of mild pediatric psoriasis, while phototherapy and systemic therapy are used in children with moderate-severe psoriasis. According to the proposed treatment algorithm, biologics are the first line of systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted systemic therapies are changing the treatment of moderate-severe pediatric psoriasis, while topical corticosteroids continue to be the first choice for mild disease. Children-centered research is needed to further improve the treatment of pediatric psoriasis.

Biological therapy in patients with psoriasis: What we know about the effects on renal function.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting 2%-3% of the general population. The link between psoriasis and renal dysfunction has been investigated, demonstrating a common pro-inflammatory pathogenesis. This study is aimed at evaluating renal function in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis treated with biological therapy. We analyzed 92 patients, correlating PASI and serum creatinine levels at baseline, after 6 months and after 1 year of continuous treatment with biological therapy. Data were analyzed using paired t-test and the linear mixed model for PASI and serum creatinine levels correlation, whereas the analysis of variances (ANOVA) was used for creatinine levels assessment between the baseline, the 6-months and, 1-year later evaluation. We observed a significant mean decrease in comparing serum creatinine levels after 1 year of biological therapy (p < 0.001). Interestingly, PASI reduction is correlated with creatinine decrease, and the renal function improvement is greater when complete psoriasis remission is attained. Our data suggest that a drop in systemic inflammation, secondary to biological therapy administration, might improve renal function. Future research is needed to confirm and expand our findings.

Deferred time of delivery of biologic therapies in patients with stabilized psoriasis leads to a 'perceived satisfaction': a multicentric study.

OBJECTIVE: Thanks to their specificity of action, biologic drugs often lead to complete clearance of psoriatic lesions. In order to maintain its effectiveness, biological therapies cannot be discontinued. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of widening the administration window of four biologic drugs, thus improving the quality of life of psoriatic patients and satisfying their desire to feel free from the disease, without loss of effectiveness. METHODS: We performed a multicentric cohort study considering patients with moderate-severe plaque psoriasis and/or arthropathic psoriasis treated with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept or ustekinumab. The study group included patients with stabilized psoriasis in which the administration regimen of the biologic drug was deferred. The control group included psoriatic patients treated according the product monograph. RESULTS: The percentage of relapses in case of deferred administration intervals was comparable to that of standard administration intervals. The delayed administration modality got a good psychological consensus from the patients themselves, that reported a greater 'perceived satisfaction'. A consistent economic advantage was reported in case of prolonged administration intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of biologic drugs with prolonged intervals maintains the same effectiveness as standard administration and produces a 'perceived satisfaction' in psoriatic patients.

A real-world economic analysis of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy: results of the CANOVA observational longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease which can also involve joints. It is often associated with burdensome comorbidities which negatively impact prognosis and quality of life (QoL). Biologic agents have been shown to be effective in controlling disease progression, but their use is associated with higher costs compared with traditional systemic treatments. The economic analysis of the CANOVA (EffeCtiveness of biologic treAtmeNts for plaque psOriasis in Italy: an obserVAtional longitudinal study of real-life clinical practice) study aims to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of biologics in a real-world context in Italy. METHODS: The annualised overall direct costs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis management, the annualised cost of biologic drugs and the cost per responder in the Italian National Health System perspective were assessed. More specifically, the cost per response and cost per sustained response of the most prescribed biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis within the CANOVA study were assessed using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at several score levels (75, 90 and 100%). RESULTS: The most frequently used biologic therapies for plaque psoriasis were secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab originator, and ixekizumab. Cost of biologics was the driver of expenditure, accounting for about 98% of total costs. Adalimumab originator was the biologic with the lowest cost per responder ratio (range: €7848 - €31,378), followed by secukinumab (range: €9015 - €33,419). Ustekinumab (range: €11,689 - €39,280) and ixekizumab (range: €11,092 - €34,289) ranked respectively third and fourth, in terms of cost-effectiveness ratio. As concerns the cost per sustained response analysis, secukinumab showed the lowest value observed (€21,375) over the other options, because of its high response rate (86% vs. 60-80%), which was achieved early in time. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapy is a valuable asset for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Concomitant assessment of treatment costs against the expected therapeutic response over time can provide physicians and payers additional insights which can complement the traditional risk-benefit profile assessment and drive treatment decisions.

Helicobacter pylori infection in psoriatic patients during biological therapy.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a relapsing inflammatory disease exacerbated by many triggers. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative bacterium causing the liberation of many cytokines and having a role in systemic inflammation. We assessed over a period of 12 months the presence of H. pylori in psoriatic patients undergoing biologic therapy and how PASI improved after its eradication. METHODS: We performed an interventional, prospective, cohort, exploratory and mono-centric study in patients affected by moderate-severe psoriasis during biological therapy to assess the correlation between psoriasis (moderate to severe forms), and H. pylori infection. We also checked if the bacterial eradication could improve the severity of psoriasis throughout the variation of PASI over a 12-month period. RESULTS: The prevalence of H. pylori was 35%. The average of PASI improved in H. pylori positive patients after the eradication (confidence interval: 33-44; P=0.023). H. pylori positive patients were more likely to have psoriatic arthropathy (P=0.049). Gastrointestinal symptoms (such as epigastric pain, postprandial heaviness, pyrosis) were found in only 31.3% of H. pylori positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Since the H. pylori infection is often asymptomatic, it can be useful to perform the 13C-Urea breath test, and to eradicate it before to start the psoriasis therapy in order to decrease the level of inflammation.

Characteristic of chronic plaque psoriasis patients treated with biologics in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Risk analysis from the PSO-BIO-COVID observational study.

Background: The susceptibility of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and the risks or benefits related to the use of biological therapies for COVID-19 are unknown. Few data about prevalence, clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 among psoriatic patients were reported. The aims of this study were 1) to assess the prevalence and severity of COVID-19 in psoriatic patients treated with biologic agents during the first phase of the emergency (22 February to 22 April 2020) in Italy, and 2) to report the clinical outcomes of patients who have been exposed to individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, aged ≥18 years and undergoing treatment with biologic agents as of 22 February 2020, were eligible to be included in PSO-BIO-COVID study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients using any biologic for psoriasis treatment between 22 February and 22 April 2020 were registered. Results: A total of 12,807 psoriatic patients were included in the PSO-BIO-COVID study. In this cohort 26 patients (0.2%) had a swab confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eleven patients required hospitalization and two died. Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 observed in our cohort of psoriatic patients (0.2%) is similar to that seen in the general population (0.31%) in Italy. However, the course of the disease was mild in most patients. Biological therapies may likely lessen 'cytokine storm' of COVID-19, which sometimes lead to multiple organ failure, ARDS, and death.

Treatment of severe psoriasis in children: recommendations of an Italian expert group.

This article provides comprehensive recommendations for the systemic treatment of severe pediatric psoriasis based on evidence obtained from a systematic review of the literature and the consensus opinion of expert dermatologists and pediatricians. For each systemic treatment, the grade of recommendation (A, B, C) based on the treatment's approval by the European Medicines Agency for childhood psoriasis and the experts' opinions is discussed. The grade of recommendation for narrow-band-ultraviolet B phototherapy, cyclosporine, and retinoids is C, while that for methotrexate is C/B. The use of adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab has a grade A recommendation. No conventional systemic treatments are approved for pediatric psoriasis. Adalimumab is approved by the European Medicines Agency as a first-line treatment for severe chronic plaque psoriasis in children (≥ 4 years old) and adolescents. Etanercept and ustekinumab are approved as second-line therapy in children ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: A treatment algorithm as well as practical tools (i.e., tabular summaries of differential diagnoses, treatment mechanism of actions, dosing regimens, control parameters) are provided to assist in therapeutic reasoning and decision-making for individual patients. These treatment recommendations are endorsed by major Italian Pediatric and Dermatology Societies. What is Known: • Guidelines for the treatment of severe pediatric psoriasis are lacking and most traditional systemic treatments are not approved for use in young patients. Although there has been decades of experience with some of the traditional agents such as phototherapy, acitretin, and cyclosporine in children, there are no RCTs on their pediatric use while RCTs investigating new biologic agents have been performed. What is New: • In this manuscript, an Italian multidisciplinary team of experts focused on treatment recommendations for severe forms of psoriasis in children based on an up-to-date review of the literature and experts' opinions.